[Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:02 pm

Your in-game name: TdZ.historyguy

Admin who banned you: MaxPayne
Date and time of banning: 10/11/2018
Reason given by the admin for the ban: using Aimlock

Your defense please: For the 5 months i've played in VK's Server i never cheated or resort to using aimlock. I am aware that online is a place where everyone wants to have fun so i would never resort to such tactics. Furthermore, when i play on the server, i just drive around and do what's within the rules.
Witnesses who support you (in-game names): Tdz.Kurumi, ShadowJack, Chillizy
Any screenshots you took for your defense:

by Guest Sat Nov 10, 2018 1:50 pm

The title is incorrect. Read the unban requests format topic. The correct form of the title to use is there.

Good luck with your unban request.

by **MaxX** Sat Nov 10, 2018 4:27 pm

whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

by **GeoGeo** Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:18 pm

Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

In a clear words different gender for drive by and different gender for aimlock

by **D4rKR420R** Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:22 pm

Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?

by **MaxX** Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:32 pm

KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?

yes, because its clear aimlock usage.

by **D4rKR420R** Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:38 pm

Maxpayne^ wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?
yes, because its clear aimlock usage.

Multiple staff members have to agree to the rulebreak, you just accepted it right away.

by **GeoGeo** Sat Nov 10, 2018 5:49 pm

KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?
yes, because its clear aimlock usage.

Multiple staff members have to agree to the rulebreak, you just accepted it right away.

It's clear aimlock, we need to ban those who uses aimlock they don't deserve to play if they play with hacks

by **D4rKR420R** Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:14 pm

GeoGeo wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?
yes, because its clear aimlock usage.

Multiple staff members have to agree to the rulebreak, you just accepted it right away.
It's clear aimlock, we need to ban those who uses aimlock they don't deserve to play if they play with hacks

Regardless of it's clear, stick with the rules. I'm telling you for your safety.

by **MaxX** Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:23 pm

KuRuMi^ wrote:
GeoGeo wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:
KuRuMi^ wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:whats that huh? who is he?
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t12465-accepted-player-report-mandy#180351

Did you just accepted the report right on the bat when multiple administrators hasn't agreed to the rulebreak?
yes, because its clear aimlock usage.

Multiple staff members have to agree to the rulebreak, you just accepted it right away.
It's clear aimlock, we need to ban those who uses aimlock they don't deserve to play if they play with hacks

Regardless of it's clear, stick with the rules. I'm telling you for your safety.

nono don't put a bullet in our head jaja, now wait for tdz history guy reply.

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:40 pm

hello everyone. thanks for the reply. I would to like defend myself saying that i was not using hacks. I just had bad ping. Oh max, did you talk with the other admins about this.

by **MaxX** Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:45 pm

historyguy55 wrote:hello everyone. thanks for the reply. I would to like defend myself saying that i was not using hacks. I just had bad ping. Oh max, did you talk with the other admins about this.

i see alot of aim flicks in your video so no lag issue that much, so you should stop lying, lying will only make this app bigger and in the end it will be denied and geogeo and i agree so i think its enough other admins can give there response as well.

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 6:54 pm

To max and geogeo, i know i understand your point. But Max you've known me since the summer and that i never use hacks.

by **SJHere** Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:03 pm

Maxpayne^ wrote:
historyguy55 wrote:hello everyone. thanks for the reply. I would to like defend myself saying that i was not using hacks. I just had bad ping. Oh max, did you talk with the other admins about this.
i see alot of aim flicks in your video so no lag issue that much, so you should stop lying, lying will only make this app bigger and in the end it will be denied and geogeo and i agree so i think its enough other admins can give there response as well.

If the person is facing horrible lag/wrap then aim-flicking is not always the reason to call him as Aimlocker directly.At one moment,I have noticed so much lags/wraps of the suspected player (in the video) and at another moment,the reporter didn't post any screenshot of /ping or /fps. Please don't accept any report directly which is related to major or this case because you need the time and have to be patient to confirm this 100% rulebreak. You can either add it in watch-list and make a discussion in admin section.

You have to follow what 4K has given the instruction :

ЧК. wrote:All reports made in which possibility of lag is involved must include a screenshot of both FPS and Ping of the reporter and the perosn being reported taken at the time of occurrence or else they may be denied if there is any doubt in possibility of lag.

Lag/wrap footages :

0:11 - look at the movement of his jumping
0:50 - he got killed after a second and this can cause due to lag
1:24 - he again got killed after one and half second (approxmiately) due to his lag.

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:35 pm

my apologies. i can't send my fps because i am banned

by **SJHere** Sat Nov 10, 2018 8:43 pm

historyguy55 wrote:my apologies. i can't send my fps because i am banned

Check your server logs.
Write this in your search box and you can find server logs :

%appdata%/Roaming/VCMP/04beta/serverlogs

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 9:56 pm

thanks i found the serverlogs. I looked into them and i didn't find the fps or
the ping.

by **MaxX** Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:35 pm

ShadowJacK. wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:
historyguy55 wrote:hello everyone. thanks for the reply. I would to like defend myself saying that i was not using hacks. I just had bad ping. Oh max, did you talk with the other admins about this.
i see alot of aim flicks in your video so no lag issue that much, so you should stop lying, lying will only make this app bigger and in the end it will be denied and geogeo and i agree so i think its enough other admins can give there response as well.
If the person is facing horrible lag/wrap then aim-flicking is not always the reason to call him as Aimlocker directly.At one moment,I have noticed so much lags/wraps of the suspected player (in the video) and at another moment,the reporter didn't post any screenshot of /ping or /fps. Please don't accept any report directly which is related to major or this case because you need the time and have to be patient to confirm this 100% rulebreak. You can either add it in watch-list and make a discussion in admin section.

You have to follow what 4K has given the instruction :
ЧК. wrote:All reports made in which possibility of lag is involved must include a screenshot of both FPS and Ping of the reporter and the perosn being reported taken at the time of occurrence or else they may be denied if there is any doubt in possibility of lag.

Lag/wrap footages :

0:11 - look at the movement of his jumping
0:50 - he got killed after a second and this can cause due to lag
1:24 - he again got killed after one and half second (approxmiately) due to his lag.

Well jack you should probably know that, lag infact help much to catch a aimlocker its not like that if lag will come player aim will be auto flicking to others. Well i see what i can do as rules say

by historyguy55 Sat Nov 10, 2018 10:52 pm

i was aimlocking max. max i was lagging.

by **SJHere** Sun Nov 11, 2018 4:47 am

Maxpayne^ wrote:
ShadowJacK. wrote:
Maxpayne^ wrote:
historyguy55 wrote:hello everyone. thanks for the reply. I would to like defend myself saying that i was not using hacks. I just had bad ping. Oh max, did you talk with the other admins about this.
i see alot of aim flicks in your video so no lag issue that much, so you should stop lying, lying will only make this app bigger and in the end it will be denied and geogeo and i agree so i think its enough other admins can give there response as well.
If the person is facing horrible lag/wrap then aim-flicking is not always the reason to call him as Aimlocker directly.At one moment,I have noticed so much lags/wraps of the suspected player (in the video) and at another moment,the reporter didn't post any screenshot of /ping or /fps. Please don't accept any report directly which is related to major or this case because you need the time and have to be patient to confirm this 100% rulebreak. You can either add it in watch-list and make a discussion in admin section.

You have to follow what 4K has given the instruction :
ЧК. wrote:All reports made in which possibility of lag is involved must include a screenshot of both FPS and Ping of the reporter and the perosn being reported taken at the time of occurrence or else they may be denied if there is any doubt in possibility of lag.

Lag/wrap footages :

0:11 - look at the movement of his jumping
0:50 - he got killed after a second and this can cause due to lag
1:24 - he again got killed after one and half second (approxmiately) due to his lag.
Well jack you should probably know that, lag infact help much to catch a aimlocker its not like that if lag will come player aim will be auto flicking to others. Well i see what i can do as rules say

I respect your opinion but you have not gone according to the rules :

Server Rules wrote:
However, punishment may only be issued if a report or a private discussion in the admin section is posted & multiple staff members (at least some over the level 8 as well) are in agreement of the rule break. The reason for this extra check is that the rule is hard to detect.

Another thing I want to include is that aim-flicking without the sharp aim or headshot and low sensitivity can be done possibly.I am not saying like that you should unban him now.I want you to confirm that report with some admins atleast and then this will be up to you to handle.

by **MaxX** Sun Nov 11, 2018 5:03 am

Unbanned for now.

[Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy Img_2010

Edit: well hope you don't use it again unbanned.

by Sponsored content

Mon	Tue	Wed	Thu	Fri	Sat	Sun
		1	2	3	4	5
6	7	8	9	10	11	12
13	14	15	16	17	18	19
20	21	22	23	24	25	26
27	28	29	30	31

[Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

[Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy

Re: [Accepted] Unban Request: TdZ.historyguy