[Accepted] Admin Report: TDZ.Kurumi

your name: F2.Thunder_Bird
Admin name: Kurmi
What he did? : Accepted the report unfairly.
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t8652-accepted-player-report-f2thunder_bird#157201
Describe: First of all I am sorry for not following the format as I didn't find it anywhere in admin reports section. Coming back to the report, I want VKs staff especially high level admins to look at this report https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t8652-accepted-player-report-f2thunder_bird#157201   This report is 1 year old and was under discussion. Kurumi issued a 7 days ban to me for this report which is even not valid. I want admins to look at this report and watch that video, I spawned, then run then /q . As the report is 1 year old I really don't remember if I had spawn protection but as you guys can see in the video geogeo's aim was too perfect and his few bullets did hit me but I didn't loose hp(spawnprotection, hp hack no ok?). The deathevade rule related to this is:
The rule says I should not /q before or after the death. But from the video it was clear that I did /q while running. Now don't tell me that I can't /q while running if someone is shooting in air :.... . I think the defense if enough. Coming back to admin report I don't think admins like kurumi should deal reports. I mentioned it many times that these kind of admins have nothing to do with adminship. These kind of admins just want promotion at any cost. They can ruin fun of anyone if it comes in way of their promotion. Gentlemen, have a look at this https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t2-vks-official-server-admins-and-moderators
Two admins (max and shadow) Got promoted for their activeness and for dealing every report fairly. Kurmi might have thought that "Oh so accepting/denying reports give higher level hmmmm, why not dig out old report and add tags on them blindly , hmmm hahahah I should do this and  Iwill get level 9 like krlozz.". kurmi really dont have to do anything with adminship and I am going to prove my words(whom I just said) by a simple statement that " last time I got banned for deathevade for 7 days by shadow.jack(valid ban). And now again for 7 days? wow. As far as I know I should be banned for 30 days or maybe permanent ban. A dead admin who don't know whats going on server can really deal with reports? really? Man this piece of junk is a second [KF]Thunder. What kurumi can do is, usage of sweet language, try to look cute and behave nice, bla bla bla. OK, this is what kurumi is, lets got back to some other points. So, as you guys can see that, that report was under discussion and everyone was posting his opinion and so, and also 4k was involved in
the report but as I said for the sake of promotion Kurumi accepted it without watchin the video carefully and reading. Why there is an admin even exist who don't know server rules properly?.
All I want is a just decision for this report and that can be "Accept this report and unban me" OR "Deny this report and ban me for 30 days or permanent"
#UpToStaff.

its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Rainbow Dash wrote:its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Do you really think that? you are genius, I was not even fighting him, I actually did even saw him attacking me as you can see the video. Also look at geogeo aim, do you think taht I could be dead with that aim?

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Do you really think that? you are genius, I was not even fighting him, I actually did even saw him attacking me as you can see the video. Also look at geogeo aim, do you think taht I could be dead with that aim?

i think you didnt read my message properly. i said i DONT think you were in combat = not a rule break. but im not sure as i said.

Rainbow Dash wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Do you really think that? you are genius, I was not even fighting him, I actually did even saw him attacking me as you can see the video. Also look at geogeo aim, do you think taht I could be dead with that aim?

i think you didnt read my message properly. i said i DONT think you were in combat = not a rule break. but im not sure as i said.

if thats the case(taht you are not sure), should I be punished?

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Do you really think that? you are genius, I was not even fighting him, I actually did even saw him attacking me as you can see the video. Also look at geogeo aim, do you think taht I could be dead with that aim?

i think you didnt read my message properly. i said i DONT think you were in combat = not a rule break. but im not sure as i said.

if thats the case(taht you are not sure), should I be punished?

¨

if you werent in combat, then no you shouldnt be. but its up to the rest to provide their opinions so we can determine it.

Rainbow Dash wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

Rainbow Dash wrote:its unclear to me if you are in combat or not. it looks kinda weird though. why would you spawn run out and then stand next to a car to quit? it didnt look like lag or pause or anything.

if you were in combat its a rule break because you were standing still and next the logical thing that would happen if you didnt quit would be death so thus you did it before a death.

but im not sure if you were in combat.

one more thing the report is kinda old so i think it should have just been closed.

kurumi probably didnt know about the warning and angel has a permanent warning system as suggested by 4k that he will implement when he can.

Do you really think that? you are genius, I was not even fighting him, I actually did even saw him attacking me as you can see the video. Also look at geogeo aim, do you think taht I could be dead with that aim?

i think you didnt read my message properly. i said i DONT think you were in combat = not a rule break. but im not sure as i said.

if thats the case(taht you are not sure), should I be punished?

¨

if you werent in combat, then no you shouldnt be. but its up to the rest to provide their opinions so we can determine it.

ok, BTW its clear from video that I was not fighting him, it could be a deathevade if I fight back to geogeo, but for me he was shooting in air and he didnt even knocked me down lol.

Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

It can’t be denied unless we investigate in the case and as you said you don’t remember so that’s why we won’t investigate and you’re lucky for that.

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

It can’t be denied unless we investigate in the case and as you said you don’t remember so that’s why we won’t investigate and you’re lucky for that.

we don't need to remember anything, I want you to investigate.

Same report on Halo and same  happens with Halo. Halo was also not fight with him but that report was accepted. So I think KuRuMi did right.
Report link: 
https://vkserver.forumotion.com/t7684-accepted-report-fshalo-death-evade?highlight=Halo
and video link which made by Stylish:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BW7DrtkTQ3k

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

It can’t be denied unless we investigate in the case and as you said you don’t remember so that’s why we won’t investigate and you’re lucky for that.

we don't need to remember anything, I want you to investigate.

I’ll check the report tonight.

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

It can’t be denied unless we investigate in the case and as you said you don’t remember so that’s why we won’t investigate and you’re lucky for that.

we don't need to remember anything, I want you to investigate.

I’ll check the report tonight.

ok.

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:

Thunder_Bird wrote:

ЧК. wrote:Old report should’ve been closed, requesting Kurumi to make the necessary changes.

Requesting you to accept the report not becasue it should be closed but because it should be denied.

It can’t be denied unless we investigate in the case and as you said you don’t remember so that’s why we won’t investigate and you’re lucky for that.

we don't need to remember anything, I want you to investigate.

I’ll check the report tonight.

ok.

In the video you disconnected at 4th second after spawn therefore your spawn protection was active so you weren’t in combat and it doesn’t count as death evade. Report should be denied, requesting Kurumi to make the adjustments before we proceed with this report.

Appearantly, I wasn't aware of the spawn protection could be an exception to the death evade rule. I've denied the report and I request someone to unban him. My apoligies.

KuRuMi^ wrote:Appearantly, I wasn't aware of the spawn protection could be an exception to the death evade rule. I've denied the report and I request someone to unban him. My apoligies.

Unbanned.

KuRuMi^ wrote:Appearantly, I wasn't aware of the spawn protection could be an exception to the death evade rule. I've denied the report and I request someone to unban him. My apoligies.

be careful next time dealing with reports, take more serious reports of old players, and dont accept them until you are sure they did break a rule.

Warned.
Report Accepted.
Thanks for reporting.