[Closed] Admin Report - =SdS=KrlozZ..

=SdS=KrlozZ... wrote:There's not any rulebreak, so this report can't be accepted, We don't have Golder rule on Admin rules, and as admin rules i did not break any rule, i just had solved with 2 reports with my knowledge, there was not enought proofs for me, so i denied them, i did not see anything rare, there's not any clearly proof, if some other admin (Who can solve with reports) thinks that it's proof enought he's free to re open the report and solve with it, but these reports was open for more than 3 days, without any response, so i just solved with them.


anyway that was my defense, that's all, i will not reply in this topic anymore if there is not a necesary request.
I did not break any Admin rule/Server Rule/Forum Rule, so this report can't be accepted.
So who will solve with this report see carefully if i did break a rule and tag me if i did, and i will defend myself.
That's all.
cya :3

5K. wrote:

=SdS=KrlozZ... wrote:There's not any rulebreak, so this report can't be accepted, We don't have Golder rule on Admin rules, and as admin rules i did not break any rule, i just had solved with 2 reports with my knowledge, there was not enought proofs for me, so i denied them, i did not see anything rare, there's not any clearly proof, if some other admin (Who can solve with reports) thinks that it's proof enought he's free to re open the report and solve with it, but these reports was open for more than 3 days, without any response, so i just solved with them.


anyway that was my defense, that's all, i will not reply in this topic anymore if there is not a necesary request.
I did not break any Admin rule/Server Rule/Forum Rule, so this report can't be accepted.
So who will solve with this report see carefully if i did break a rule and tag me if i did, and i will defend myself.
That's all.
cya :3

So your point is: Using aimlock/3rd Programn not break any rules ? Hmm..
@Chuck Norris @VK.Angel.OfDeath @4K.

=SdS=KrlozZ... wrote:

5K. wrote:

=SdS=KrlozZ... wrote:There's not any rulebreak, so this report can't be accepted, We don't have Golder rule on Admin rules, and as admin rules i did not break any rule, i just had solved with 2 reports with my knowledge, there was not enought proofs for me, so i denied them, i did not see anything rare, there's not any clearly proof, if some other admin (Who can solve with reports) thinks that it's proof enought he's free to re open the report and solve with it, but these reports was open for more than 3 days, without any response, so i just solved with them.


anyway that was my defense, that's all, i will not reply in this topic anymore if there is not a necesary request.
I did not break any Admin rule/Server Rule/Forum Rule, so this report can't be accepted.
So who will solve with this report see carefully if i did break a rule and tag me if i did, and i will defend myself.
That's all.
cya :3

So your point is: Using aimlock/3rd Programn not break any rules ? Hmm..
@Chuck Norris @VK.Angel.OfDeath @4K.

Please read more english.
I said i did not break any rule, understand that I, ME, MYSELF.

=SdS=KrlozZ... wrote:There's not any rulebreak, so this report can't be accepted, We don't have Golder rule on Admin rules, and as admin rules i did not break any rule, i just had solved with 2 reports with my knowledge, there was not enought proofs for me, so i denied them, i did not see anything rare, there's not any clearly proof, if some other admin (Who can solve with reports) thinks that it's proof enought he's free to re open the report and solve with it, but these reports was open for more than 3 days, without any response, so i just solved with them.


anyway that was my defense, that's all, i will not reply in this topic anymore if there is not a necesary request.
I did not break any Admin rule/Server Rule/Forum Rule, so this report can't be accepted.
So who will solve with this report see carefully if i did break a rule and tag me if i did, and i will defend myself.
That's all.

cya :3