[Denied] Report [EK]Zeyad_Ahmed - discrimination

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

Zeyad_Ahmed wrote:What flake do you think that you are innocent I can report you but iam not crying burthurt like you, and when I said 24 / 2 I mean that you 12 old and immature.

Even if we assume that I am "12 old" (which I'm not), what does that prove? Nothing, right? However, you have discriminated against me.
Basing maturity on age goes to show your level of intelligence.

Agreed he discriminated you, but only right now on forums not in the server from the proof you gave. And as you're well aware server rules don't apply on forums so he's safe.

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

I already told you that if you're using official names like calling a group of African Americans and Jamaicans with African Americans and Jamaicans. But if you call them blacks or n iggas then it's discrimination.

If you say someone's age then it related to the first part in the previous paragraph and if you call someone kid or baby then it's related to the second part.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

I already told you that if you're using official names like calling a group of African Americans and Jamaicans with African Americans and Jamaicans. But if you call them blacks or n iggas then it's discrimination.

If you say someone's age then it related to the first part in the previous paragraph and if you call someone kid or baby then it's related to the second part.

That justification is very obstinate.
Who is to decide what are official names and what aren't? If Person C says one of these "official terms" in another language, who is to decide whether it stays official or not? If Person C makes a language where the official term is n igga, are we to punish C or not?

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

I already told you that if you're using official names like calling a group of African Americans and Jamaicans with African Americans and Jamaicans. But if you call them blacks or n iggas then it's discrimination.

If you say someone's age then it related to the first part in the previous paragraph and if you call someone kid or baby then it's related to the second part.

That justification is very obstinate.
Who is to decide what are official names and what aren't? If Person C says one of these "official terms" in another language, who is to decide whether it stays official or not? If Person C makes a language where the official term is n igga, are we to punish C or not?

If you base groups of their ethnic names or nationality rather than based on skin color.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

I already told you that if you're using official names like calling a group of African Americans and Jamaicans with African Americans and Jamaicans. But if you call them blacks or n iggas then it's discrimination.

If you say someone's age then it related to the first part in the previous paragraph and if you call someone kid or baby then it's related to the second part.

That justification is very obstinate.
Who is to decide what are official names and what aren't? If Person C says one of these "official terms" in another language, who is to decide whether it stays official or not? If Person C makes a language where the official term is n igga, are we to punish C or not?

If you base groups of their ethnic names or nationality rather than based on skin color.

Except that discriminating on nationality is not allowed and "groups" - "group, permit, restrict or otherwise simply treat differently".

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Mate, I don't even know Zeyad well and I know you personally and know you for years and are a good friend. I agreed now because he was discriminating and I don't support such behavior either, but discrimination is not in forum rules.

Yes, he posted hateful post for you and has done it often, but it doesn't make you innocent as you've done it a lot too. Either way I can't deal with forum matters so PM Angel a forum report if you want justice.

He might have said that in the server discriminating you as he just now revealed his intention, but the proof you presented doesn't proof his intention and we don't punish people just based on confessions so even if he revealed his intention we can't punish him.

Omg mate fk his intention, that message alone is enough to count as discrimination. I'm getting tired of this now.
Tell me your opinion about the Person A, Person B and Person C example I gave above otherwise
.

I already told you that if you're using official names like calling a group of African Americans and Jamaicans with African Americans and Jamaicans. But if you call them blacks or n iggas then it's discrimination.

If you say someone's age then it related to the first part in the previous paragraph and if you call someone kid or baby then it's related to the second part.

That justification is very obstinate.
Who is to decide what are official names and what aren't? If Person C says one of these "official terms" in another language, who is to decide whether it stays official or not? If Person C makes a language where the official term is n igga, are we to punish C or not?

If you base groups of their ethnic names or nationality rather than based on skin color.

Except that discriminating on nationality is not allowed and "groups" - "group, permit, restrict or otherwise simply treat differently".

If there a group of Pakistanis and Indians you would call them Pakistanis and Indians rather than assuming they all are Pakistanis or all are Indians which people often do.

4K. wrote:I'm not grouping; just saying that if you see 3 Pakistanis and 3 Indians in a server and you call them all Indians because you feel they both are same and don't give significance to Pakistan.

Why are you getting tired? You said I lost the arguments which is why I starred it again to clear your misunderstanding that I lost the argument.

That's exactly what you want, to punish him using your admin power like you did when muting him.

In my honest opinion you didn't mean to discriminate him while he did mean it which was shown by his previous reply to the topic, but since he didn't reveal this intention in the server we cannot prove his intention even if he confessses it here. Also what makes me think that you made this report is just to punish him for discrediting you by revealing your age is that you made this report after almost a week and not immediately. Also you didn't punish him directly to act as if you're unbiased.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:I'm not grouping; just saying that if you see 3 Pakistanis and 3 Indians in a server and you call them all Indians because you feel they both are same and don't give significance to Pakistan.

Why are you getting tired? You said I lost the arguments which is why I starred it again to clear your misunderstanding that I lost the argument.

That's exactly what you want, to punish him using your admin power like you did when muting him.

In my honest opinion you didn't mean to discriminate him while he did mean it which was shown by his previous reply to the topic, but since he didn't reveal this intention in the server we cannot prove his intention even if he confessses it here. Also what makes me think that you made this report is just to punish him for discrediting you by revealing your age is that you made this report after almost a week and not immediately. Also you didn't punish him directly to act as if you're unbiased.

Mate, that statement is discriminatory itself, but you don't seem to understand it. The reason I made this report a week later is because I didn't notice that Zeyad was discriminating, and the reason I'm not punishing him directly is because I am on an LOA.

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:I'm not grouping; just saying that if you see 3 Pakistanis and 3 Indians in a server and you call them all Indians because you feel they both are same and don't give significance to Pakistan.

Why are you getting tired? You said I lost the arguments which is why I starred it again to clear your misunderstanding that I lost the argument.

That's exactly what you want, to punish him using your admin power like you did when muting him.

In my honest opinion you didn't mean to discriminate him while he did mean it which was shown by his previous reply to the topic, but since he didn't reveal this intention in the server we cannot prove his intention even if he confessses it here. Also what makes me think that you made this report is just to punish him for discrediting you by revealing your age is that you made this report after almost a week and not immediately. Also you didn't punish him directly to act as if you're unbiased.

Mate, that statement is discriminatory itself, but you don't seem to understand it. The reason I made this report a week later is because I didn't notice that Zeyad was discriminating, and the reason I'm not punishing him directly is because I am on an LOA.

Let me get this straight, in your opinion saying someone's age is discriminating?

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:I'm not grouping; just saying that if you see 3 Pakistanis and 3 Indians in a server and you call them all Indians because you feel they both are same and don't give significance to Pakistan.

Why are you getting tired? You said I lost the arguments which is why I starred it again to clear your misunderstanding that I lost the argument.

That's exactly what you want, to punish him using your admin power like you did when muting him.

In my honest opinion you didn't mean to discriminate him while he did mean it which was shown by his previous reply to the topic, but since he didn't reveal this intention in the server we cannot prove his intention even if he confessses it here. Also what makes me think that you made this report is just to punish him for discrediting you by revealing your age is that you made this report after almost a week and not immediately. Also you didn't punish him directly to act as if you're unbiased.

Mate, that statement is discriminatory itself, but you don't seem to understand it. The reason I made this report a week later is because I didn't notice that Zeyad was discriminating, and the reason I'm not punishing him directly is because I am on an LOA.

Let me get this straight, in your opinion saying someone's age is discriminating?

Not in my opinion. In fact saying someone's age is discriminating.

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:I'm not grouping; just saying that if you see 3 Pakistanis and 3 Indians in a server and you call them all Indians because you feel they both are same and don't give significance to Pakistan.

Why are you getting tired? You said I lost the arguments which is why I starred it again to clear your misunderstanding that I lost the argument.

That's exactly what you want, to punish him using your admin power like you did when muting him.

In my honest opinion you didn't mean to discriminate him while he did mean it which was shown by his previous reply to the topic, but since he didn't reveal this intention in the server we cannot prove his intention even if he confessses it here. Also what makes me think that you made this report is just to punish him for discrediting you by revealing your age is that you made this report after almost a week and not immediately. Also you didn't punish him directly to act as if you're unbiased.

Mate, that statement is discriminatory itself, but you don't seem to understand it. The reason I made this report a week later is because I didn't notice that Zeyad was discriminating, and the reason I'm not punishing him directly is because I am on an LOA.

Let me get this straight, in your opinion saying someone's age is discriminating?

Not in my opinion. In fact saying someone's age is discriminating.

Then why do we ask admin applicants their age?

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

Because the level is given on the server, not the forum.

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

Because the level is given on the server, not the forum.

But we ask age on forums, not ingame.

Anyways that's a little off topic, the reason your objection was overruled because the management staff didn't feel it's wrong to ask age in the application.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

Because the level is given on the server, not the forum.

But we ask age on forums, not ingame.

Anyways that's a little off topic, the reason your objection was overruled because the management staff didn't feel it's wrong to ask age in the application.

Whatever. Deal with this report.

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

Because the level is given on the server, not the forum.

But we ask age on forums, not ingame.

Anyways that's a little off topic, the reason your objection was overruled because the management staff didn't feel it's wrong to ask age in the application.

Whatever. Deal with this report.

Finally the rq comes.

Mate, you can't beat me in arguments and debates because I only debate after thinking carefully of the matter and possible outcomes.

Report will be denied since that is not age discrimination.

Report denied.
Thanks for reporting.

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:

EK.CrystalBlue wrote:

4K. wrote:Why will they be punished when discrimination is not mentioned in forum rules.

Because the level is given on the server, not the forum.

But we ask age on forums, not ingame.

Anyways that's a little off topic, the reason your objection was overruled because the management staff didn't feel it's wrong to ask age in the application.

Whatever. Deal with this report.

Finally the rq comes.

Mate, you can't beat me in arguments and debates because I only debate after thinking carefully of the matter and possible outcomes.

Report will be denied since that is not age discrimination.

Report denied.
Thanks for reporting.

(this means that I'll deal with it once I'm back from my LOA.)