[Denied] Admin report - Error[X]

Your in-game name: [ON]Vipe[R]
Rulebreaker (in-game name): [KF]Error[X]
Date and time of Rulebreaking: 03.29.2017 17:17:15
What did he do? Describe please: He mute grand player rider without knowing that he is not spamming in teamchat its a bug he should have verbal warned before at least, although its a bug.

Players who witnessed the violation (in-game names): None.

Any links to screenshots you took as evidence:

I already warned him many times, even warned before too, but this time i've to mute him, he got that it is a bug, but continously doing is not great, Thats why I muted him this time. Viper first you have to ask me bro.

[KF]Error[X] wrote:I already warned him many times, even warned before too, but this time i've to mute him, he got that it is a bug, but continously doing is not great, Thats why I muted him this time. Viper first you have to ask me bro.

Proof that you warned him before?

It was a little time before, but i can give you the proofs where I first mute him, after giving warns.

Please someone ban viper he is spamming in forum.

ErrorX, posting the logs may help.
Topic moved to Admin reports.

=F2=HunterWaqar wrote:Please someone ban viper he is spamming in forum.

Lmfao Really? ...Stop Posting here if you are not involved.

[KF]Error[X] wrote:It was a little time before, but i can give you the proofs where I first mute him, after giving warns.

For the same reason? if yes give me logs.

Stop Spaming VIPER

GanGSte[R]* wrote:Stop Spaming VIPER

You're the one who is spamming its my pleasure to report a rulebreaker please get outa here if you are not involved in it,tenkz.
kthxbye.

I saw rider was spamming rider also knows that it is a bug he was spaming very hard for enjoying it was Error's duty to mute him he did his duty very well.

=F2=HunterWaqar wrote:I saw rider was spamming rider also knows that it is a bug he was spaming very hard for enjoying it was Error's duty to mute him he did his duty very well.

Will you stop posting in reports not relating to you? If you trouble doing that you'll soon get a forum ban.

But viper is also spamming in my posts.

=F2=HunterWaqar wrote:But viper is also spamming in my posts.

I don't care, you're replying uselessly here and if I see 1 more reply I'll start deleting your posts.

Can someone post the logs of his spam?
It will help us to solve this case.

[EK]Arnold^ wrote:Can someone post the logs of his spam?
It will help us to solve this case.

We just need logs of Error warning him before the /mute.

btw that's not Error, It's Leo posting for him. Proof: Error's English is not that good.

If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

I think I already told you when i warned him first he knew that it is a bug but he didnt stop he kept on doing spamming in teamchat. so what should I do now? only /warn after seeing his spam? and you are not admin plus you dont play when i play how can you say that i am inactive? I was little inactive because of my exams but i was still coming now exams over i will play.

[KF]Error[X] wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

I think I already told you when i warned him first he knew that it is a bug but he didnt stop he kept on doing spamming in teamchat. so what should I do now? only /warn after seeing his spam? and you are not admin plus you dont play when i play how can you say that i am inactive? I was little inactive because of my exams but i was still coming now exams over i will play.

Post logs of you warning him before?

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

Are you being nut?
Can't you read this?

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

[EK]Arnold^ wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

Are you being nut?
Can't you read this?

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Can u please go away Arno? If error says he warned him before he must post proofs.

This Post is Just For Trolling Admins

GanGSte[R]* wrote:This Post is Just For Trolling Admins

How many times will i tell you stop spamming with useless posts and stop posting in reports unless you are a witnesser.

Error, why don't you post the log and get this over with? If you're speaking the truth, then posting the logs won't affect you at all.

Dark_Abdo wrote:

GanGSte[R]* wrote:This Post is Just For Trolling Admins

How many times will i tell you stop spamming with useless posts and stop posting in reports unless you are a witnesser.

Dont Try To Be My Teacher

GanGSte[R]* wrote:

Dark_Abdo wrote:

GanGSte[R]* wrote:This Post is Just For Trolling Admins

How many times will i tell you stop spamming with useless posts and stop posting in reports unless you are a witnesser.

Dont Try To Be My Teacher

He's trying to help you from avoiding further punishment such as forum ban. You're already banned in server for stealing and I gave such a low ban period, ask Champion how he was banned forever months. Behave yourself and stop breaking forum rules if you don't want me to extend your ban duration.

Vipe[R] wrote:

[EK]Arnold^ wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

Are you being nut?
Can't you read this?

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Can u please go away Arno? If error says he warned him before he must post proofs.

Dear Viper, I'm admin here for a reason.

Vipe[R] wrote:

[KF]Error[X] wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

I think I already told you when i warned him first he knew that it is a bug but he didnt stop he kept on doing spamming in teamchat. so what should I do now? only /warn after seeing his spam? and you are not admin plus you dont play when i play how can you say that i am inactive? I was little inactive because of my exams but i was still coming now exams over i will play.

Post logs of you warning him before?

Mate, there are some situations were you have to give a direct mute, and this player he muted is already a frequent spammer and never listens.

Let's say you say a msg 3-4 times consecutively then you'll be warned, but if you suddenly flood the whole chat then a warning won't help because it will be probably missed by the spammer due to spam so mute is the best option

If Error did not know about the bug then he did the right thing to mute him directly.

4K. wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

[KF]Error[X] wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:

Vipe[R] wrote:

Chuck Norris wrote:If a report about an admins action involves a temporary server bug, that is entirely caused by me. It's not really fair to even warn the admin. He is just doing his job, the bug makes it seem like you're frequently spamming and therefor error can't be blamed (he is just following the rules and the bug makes it seem like the player is breaking rules).

Also if Error says: Well he did it several times and was verbally warned, but didn't listen, then he is definitely in the rights. An admins word is worth more than the player's word if not enough proof is presented. I recommend that viper posts screenshots that shows that Error warned the player for a first time spam.

But even if you do that Viper, he would only receive a small warning. If we ignore the bug it is still not that serious for a first time offense and with the bug I will take most of the blame since it's my fault for causing the bug to begin with. I'll have the bug fixed by the end of the week.

Admin has to verbal warn before and error is not much active so how can it prove that error verbal warned before?

Good question. The answer is simple, I don't have to. If it's your Word against error, error wins. If we required all admins to record a video or take screenshots of the rule breakers they're punishing that would be too much. Also you might wanna read the PM you quoted. It's a bug caused by me and I have to fix it, Error is following the rules because that bug makes it seem like the spammer is spamming frequently. You don't verbally warn someone that spams that much (that the command is making it seem) according to the rules.

Ok if not verbal warn then a /warn at least why /mute?

I told you several times the bug makes it seem like you spam a lot and the rules depend on the situation + spam of that capacity can be counted in the rule that says that the admin ¨has to protect the server no matter what. For example if a manager starts banning everyone on the server, an admin has to ban the manager or do what they can, to stop him from doing it, in order to protect the server.

Its not the players fault it's the scripters fault and the players is getting muted for it.

I think I already told you when i warned him first he knew that it is a bug but he didnt stop he kept on doing spamming in teamchat. so what should I do now? only /warn after seeing his spam? and you are not admin plus you dont play when i play how can you say that i am inactive? I was little inactive because of my exams but i was still coming now exams over i will play.

Post logs of you warning him before?

Mate, there are some situations were you have to give a direct mute, and this player he muted is already a frequent spammer and never listens.

Let's say you say a msg 3-4 times consecutively then you'll be warned, but if you suddenly flood the whole chat then a warning won't help because it will be probably missed by the spammer due to spam so mute is the best option

If Error did not know about the bug then he did the right thing to mute him directly.

Oh sorry I didn't know that so if error did right think this report shall be denied.

Any +8 admins deny this report.

Denied.